WHO
IS A HOSTILE WITNESS?
A
hostile witness refers to an individual who, through their testimony, conduct,
attitude, or demeanor, appears to exhibit bias against the party who called
them as a witness or demonstrates a reluctance to tell the truth[1]. The term
"hostile" in this context does not necessarily imply a personal
animosity between the witness and the party calling them, but rather suggests
an adverse or uncooperative stance. A hostile witness is typically
characterized by actions such as providing false information or deliberately
altering their previous statements. Their demeanor and behavior during the
proceedings may clearly indicate a bias against the party who called them as a
witness. This bias can manifest through aggressive or uncooperative behavior,
evasive answers, intentional misrepresentations, or a general lack of
cooperation. The concept of a hostile witness is significant in legal
proceedings as it raises concerns about the credibility and reliability of the
testimony provided. When a witness exhibits signs of hostility, it may suggest
a lack of impartiality and raise doubts about the accuracy of their statements.
This can impact the weight given to their testimony by the court or tribunal.
The
designation of a witness as hostile may have various implications for the party
calling them. It can potentially allow the examining party to ask leading
questions, which are typically not allowed during examination in chief, in
order to challenge the witness's credibility or to elicit more forthright
responses. The purpose is to reveal inconsistencies, contradictions, or
ulterior motives that may undermine the witness's credibility or the veracity
of their testimony.
WHAT
TO BE DONE WHEN A WITNESS TURNS HOSTILE IN PROCEEDINGS
A
witness who turns hosting in the middle of proceedings can be treated as a
hostile witnessed and the calling party may seek leave of the court under
section 163 of the Law of Evidence Act[2] to cross-examine him or
her so as to discredit elicited facts.
Also,
impeachment is another way that an advocate may use when a witness turns
hostile. If the witness contradicts their earlier statements or provides false
information, their credibility can be challenged. This can be achieved by
presenting evidence such as prior inconsistent statements, documents, or
testimonies that undermine the hostile witness's version of events. In some
cases, witnesses turn hostile not on their own accord or behavior, but due to
the limited knowledge of the law and others forgets what they said earlier or
what they have been directed to say by an advocate. In this case, an advocate
may ask a court to permit a witness to refresh memory as provided under section
168 of The Law of Evidence Act[3].
VALUE
OF THE EVIDENCE OF A WITNESS DECLARED HOSTILE
When
a witness is treated as hostile, it means that their credibility and
reliability are called into question. As a result, their testimony is often
viewed as lacking credibility and is given little or no weight. The reason for
treating the evidence of a hostile witness as unworthy of credit is due to
their perceived unreliability.
In
the case of Alowo vs. Republic[4], the Court of Appeal for
East Africa provided insight into the basis for allowing a witness to be
treated as hostile. The court stated that the key factor in granting permission
to treat a witness as hostile is the existence of a conflict between the
witness's current testimony and their earlier facts. This conflict serves to
demonstrate the witness's unreliability, which in turn renders their evidence
insignificant or negligible. The underlying principle is that when a witness
displays inconsistencies of their story, it raises doubts about their
truthfulness and reliability. This inconsistency undermines their credibility
as a witness, making their testimony less persuasive or reliable in the eyes of
the court or tribunal.
It's important to note that the treatment of a witness as hostile and the assessment of their credibility ultimately rest with the court or tribunal. The court examines the evidence presented, considers the witness's demeanor, consistency, and any conflicting statements, and determines the weight and credibility to be assigned to their testimony.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CASE
LAWS
Alowo
vs. Republic [1972] E.A.324
LEGISLATIONS
The
Law of Evidence Act [CAP. 6 R.E. 2019] s. 163
OTHER
SOURCES
Tanzanianweb,
“A hostile witness”,
https://www.tanzanianweb.co.tz/2021/06/a-hostile-witness.html accessed June 20,
2023
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.