Kalelsela v. Mwamalili (PC) Civ. App. 54-D-70; 5/11/70; Biron J.
The appellant filed a petition for divorce against the respondent her husband alleging desertion and refusal to maintain her and the children of the marriage. There were three children from the union of nine years but the respondent disputed the paternity of the last child. The
Held: (1) “I fully agree with the Mbeya District Court as to the sanctity of marriage and that such union should not likely to be broken. Even so, a court cannot and should not blind itself to the realities of the position. Whether or not, as alleged by the husband, Emmanuel, his father-in-law is responsible for the break-up of the marriage, it is abundantly clear from the proceedings as a whole that the marriage has broken down. In fact, as noted, the husband disputes the paternity of the last child born to them. Such attitude, apart from any other consideration, hardly bodes well for a happy resumption of married life.” (2) “Whatever the merits or demerits of the Ilomba Primary Court’s decision granting the divorce, the fact remains that the husband Emmanuel did not appeal from it, but instead he filed a suit in the Kyela Urban Primary Court claiming the refund of six head of cattle. He is therefore, to my mind, stopped from disputing the validity of the divorce granted by the
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.