“150”, Aptitude Test Questions and Answers for Insurance Officer II (Claims) -National Insurance Corporation (NIC).
ABSTRACT
This preparation material contains 150
premium multiple-choice aptitude test questions and answers designed
for candidates preparing for the Insurance Officer II (Claims) – National
Insurance Corporation (NIC) position in Tanzania. The questions
cover practical claims assessment, insurance principles, risk analysis, policy
interpretation, claims investigation, premium and endorsement verification,
motor vehicle claims, customer complaints, computerized claims records, fraud
indicators, valuation, indemnity, subrogation, contribution, and claims
settlement. The questions are intentionally structured with closely related
distractors to reflect the analytical and challenging nature of public service
online aptitude tests. Each question is accompanied by the correct answer and a
detailed rationale to strengthen candidates' understanding and practical application
of insurance and claims concepts.
Prepared
by: Insurance Officer II (Claims)
An
author based in Dar-es-salaam.
0628729934.
Date:August
14, 2026
Dear
applicants,
This
collection of questions and answers has beenprepared to help all of you to understand
the key areas tested during the interview. The goal is to provide a useful, and
practical study guide so you can all perform confidently and fairly in the
selection process. I wish you the best of luck, and may this resource support
you in achieving success!
Warm
regards,
Insurance
Officer II (Claims)
For
Personal Use by Applicants Preparing for Insurance Officer II
(Claims) -National
Insurance Corporation (NIC).
ALL
QUESTIONSARE COMPILED TOGETHER.
1. An insurer receives a motor claim shortly after an
accident, but the claimant has not yet provided a police report. The claimant
explains that the report is still being processed. What is the most appropriate
claims-handling approach?
A. Keep the
claim under review while obtaining the outstanding evidence
B. Reject the claim because every police report must accompany notification
C. Pay the claim because the accident has already been reported
D. Close the claim until the claimant submits the complete documentation
Answer: A
Rationale: A missing document does not necessarily justify
immediate rejection where the claimant has provided a reasonable explanation
and the evidence can still be obtained. The claims officer should register and
assess the claim, identify the outstanding police report, maintain appropriate
follow-up and continue processing other aspects that can reasonably be
verified. Closing or rejecting the claim prematurely could disadvantage a
genuine claimant, while payment before sufficient verification would weaken
claims controls.
2. A fire claim is reported after an insured warehouse
catches fire. Investigation establishes that the fire originated from an
electrical fault, but the policy excludes losses caused by electrical
short-circuit damage while covering resulting fire damage. Which issue should
the claims officer distinguish carefully?
A. The age of
the warehouse from the cause of the fire
B. Damage directly caused by the excluded event from subsequent covered damage
C. The amount of premium from the value of the damaged property
D. The ownership of the warehouse from the identity of the tenant
Answer: B
Rationale: Where a policy distinguishes between an excluded
initiating event and resulting damage, the claims officer must carefully
establish what damage was directly caused by the excluded peril and what damage
resulted from a separately covered peril such as fire. The existence of an
electrical fault does not necessarily mean every consequence is automatically
excluded. The precise policy wording, causal sequence and nature of each item
of damage must therefore be examined before settlement.
3. A claims officer is asked to establish a reserve for a
newly reported claim. At the time of assessment, the exact final settlement
amount is uncertain, but available evidence suggests that the claim may
ultimately cost approximately TZS 18 million. What is the main purpose of
establishing a claim reserve?
A. To guarantee
that exactly TZS 18 million will eventually be paid
B. To determine the premium that the claimant should have paid
C. To estimate the insurer's expected future financial liability
D. To replace the need for investigation of the claim
Answer: C
Rationale: A claims reserve is an estimate of the insurer's
expected financial obligation arising from a reported loss that has not yet
been finally settled. It supports financial planning, claims management and
accurate assessment of outstanding liabilities. The reserve is not a guarantee
of the eventual settlement amount and does not remove the need for continuing
investigation as new information becomes available. It may therefore be revised
as the circumstances of the claim become clearer.
4. A motor claim initially appears likely to cost TZS 6
million. After dismantling the vehicle, the repairer discovers additional
accident-related damage and the revised assessment becomes TZS 10 million. What
should the claims officer normally consider doing with the claim reserve?
A. Leave the
reserve unchanged until final payment
B. Reduce the reserve because dismantling has already occurred
C. Close the reserve and open a separate claim for the additional damage
D. Review and revise the reserve to reflect the updated expected liability
Answer: D
Rationale: Claims reserves should reflect the best available
estimate of the insurer's outstanding liability as information develops. When
additional covered damage is identified and the expected settlement increases
materially, the reserve should be reviewed and adjusted accordingly, subject to
the insurer's procedures. Keeping an outdated reserve would understate the
expected liability, while creating an unnecessary separate claim could distort
the claims record where the additional damage forms part of the same insured
event.
5. An insured reports a claim six months after an accident,
although the policy requires claims to be notified promptly. The insured
explains that they initially believed the damage was minor but later discovered
significant mechanical problems. What should the claims officer primarily
investigate?
A. Whether the
delay is reasonable under the circumstances and whether it prejudiced the
insurer
B. Whether every late claim must automatically be rejected
C. Whether the insured has made a claim with another insurer
D. Whether the vehicle was purchased from an authorized dealer
Answer: A
Rationale: Late notification may raise an issue under the policy,
but the officer should establish the circumstances causing the delay, the
applicable notification condition and whether the delay materially affected the
insurer's ability to investigate or protect its interests. A late claim should
not automatically be treated as invalid without considering the policy wording
and relevant circumstances. The key question is therefore the contractual
significance of the delay and any resulting prejudice.
6. A commercial property claim involves damaged machinery.
The machinery is ten years old, and the policy settlement basis requires
consideration of depreciation. Which information is most relevant when
determining the depreciated value?
A. The
claimant's preferred replacement supplier
B. The age, condition and expected useful life of the machinery
C. The number of employees operating the machinery
D. The date on which the claim was first registered
Answer: B
Rationale: Depreciation reflects factors such as age, condition,
useful life and the reduction in value associated with use and deterioration,
subject to the policy's particular valuation basis. The age and physical
condition of machinery are therefore important in determining an appropriate
depreciated value. The replacement supplier, employee numbers and claim
registration date do not directly establish the machinery's depreciated value.
7. An insurer has settled a claim for damaged commercial
equipment and retains the damaged equipment as salvage. Which claims record
would be most useful for controlling the subsequent disposal or recovery
process?
A. The
claimant's personal contact preferences
B. The original premium receipt only
C. The salvage description, estimated value and disposal status
D. The employee attendance record for the claims department
Answer: C
Rationale: Proper salvage records allow the insurer to identify the
recovered property, monitor its estimated and eventual value, document disposal
arrangements and account for any recovery. This is particularly important
because salvage may have a financial impact on the insurer's net claims cost.
Customer preferences, premium receipts and staff attendance records do not provide
the necessary control over the physical and financial handling of salvage.
8. A motor insurer settles a total-loss claim and obtains
possession of the damaged vehicle as salvage. The vehicle still has a valid
registration document in the insured's name. What should the claims officer
ensure before disposal?
A. That the
vehicle is disposed of without retaining any records
B. That ownership, documentation and disposal procedures are properly
controlled
C. That the claimant continues paying insurance premiums on the vehicle
D. That the vehicle is immediately returned to the claimant without assessment
Answer: B
Rationale: Salvage disposal involves both physical and documentary
controls. The insurer should ensure that ownership documentation, transfer
requirements, valuation, disposal authorization and other applicable procedures
are properly addressed before the salvage is released or sold. Simply disposing
of the vehicle without documentation could create legal, financial and audit
problems. The claimant's future premium payments do not determine how recovered
salvage should be controlled.
9. A claimant accepts an insurer's offer for a covered loss
but requests that the insurer pay the settlement directly to the repairer
instead of paying the claimant. What should the claims officer primarily
verify?
A. Whether the
claimant's vehicle was purchased through financing
B. Whether the repairer has the largest workshop in the region
C. Whether the claimant has previously used that repairer
D. Whether direct payment is permitted and properly authorized under the claims
arrangement
Answer: D
Rationale: Direct payment to a repairer may be an appropriate
settlement mechanism where authorized, but the insurer should verify the
claimant's authority, the repair arrangement, the amount payable and the
applicable internal controls before making payment. The size of the repairer's
workshop, previous use and financing arrangements do not determine whether
direct settlement is properly authorized. Payment controls are important
because the insurer must ensure that settlement is made to the correct party
for the correct amount.
10. A claim is partly admitted because the insurer has
confirmed coverage for some items but requires further investigation concerning
other items. What is the main advantage of making a partial settlement where
appropriate?
A. It
eliminates the need to investigate the remaining items
B. It allows the insurer to settle established liability without unnecessarily
delaying undisputed amounts
C. It guarantees that the remaining portion will eventually be accepted
D. It prevents the claimant from providing additional evidence
Answer: B
Rationale: Where liability for part of a claim has been established
but other elements remain under investigation, a properly authorized partial
settlement can provide timely compensation for the undisputed portion while
allowing the remaining issues to be resolved separately. It does not mean that
the unresolved portion is automatically accepted, nor does it remove the need
for evidence. This approach can improve customer service while maintaining
appropriate claims controls.
11. An insured receives a settlement offer for a damaged
building but disputes the valuation of one particular item. The undisputed
portion has already been agreed. What should the claims officer generally
consider?
A. Withholding
the entire settlement until every issue is resolved
B. Rejecting the disputed item automatically
C. Paying the undisputed amount while separately reviewing the disputed
component, where permitted
D. Increasing the disputed amount simply to avoid a complaint
Answer: C
Rationale: Where the insurer has established liability for an
undisputed portion of a claim, it may be appropriate to settle that portion
while continuing to assess the genuinely disputed component, subject to policy
terms and internal authority. This avoids unnecessarily withholding amounts
that are already agreed while preserving the insurer's ability to investigate
the disputed item. Automatically rejecting or increasing the disputed amount
without evidence would not represent sound claims practice.
12. An insurer has paid a claim arising from damage caused
by a contractor whose negligence contributed to the loss. Which information
would be particularly important for pursuing potential recovery from the contractor?
A. Evidence
establishing the contractor's responsibility for the loss
B. The claimant's preferred method of receiving future premiums
C. The age of the insurer's claims management software
D. The claimant's previous unrelated insurance claims
Answer: A
Rationale: Potential recovery from a responsible third party
depends on establishing that the third party was legally or contractually
responsible for the loss and that the insurer has a basis for pursuing recovery
after indemnifying its insured. Evidence such as contracts, photographs,
reports, correspondence, witness statements and other relevant material may
therefore be important. Unrelated customer information and claims-system age do
not establish the contractor's responsibility.
13. A claimant informs the insurer that the damaged property
has already been disposed of before the insurer's assessor could inspect it.
Why can this create a significant claims issue?
A. It
automatically makes the insurance policy invalid
B. It may prevent the insurer from independently verifying the nature and
extent of the alleged damage
C. It automatically proves that the claimant committed fraud
D. It means that the claimant must purchase a new policy
Answer: B
Rationale: Disposal of damaged property before inspection may
compromise the insurer's ability to independently establish the cause, extent
and value of the loss. The officer should therefore investigate the
circumstances, consider whether alternative evidence is available and assess
whether the insurer's contractual rights were affected. The disposal does not
automatically establish fraud or invalidate the entire policy, but it can
materially affect the quality of available evidence.
14. A motor claim involves a damaged vehicle that can be
repaired, but the repairs would require replacing several safety-critical
components. The claimant proposes a cheaper repair method that leaves some
components unreplaced. What should primarily guide the insurer's decision?
A. The
claimant's desire to reduce repair time
B. The repairer's willingness to accept a lower fee
C. The technical and safety requirements for restoring the vehicle
appropriately
D. The amount of premium paid for the current policy
Answer: C
Rationale: Claims settlement should not be based solely on
minimizing cost where the proposed repair could compromise the safety or
appropriate restoration of the insured vehicle. The insurer should consider
qualified technical evidence, manufacturer or applicable safety requirements
and whether the proposed repairs adequately restore the vehicle. Premium paid
does not determine the technical repair standard, and customer or repairer
preferences cannot override legitimate safety considerations.
15. A claimant submits a second claim relating to the same
property after the first claim has already been settled. The claimant states
that the second claim concerns additional damage discovered later from the same
incident. What should the claims officer establish first?
A. Whether the
original assessor has changed employment
B. Whether the claimant has changed their telephone number
C. Whether the claimant prefers cash settlement
D. Whether the newly reported damage genuinely arose from the original insured
event and was not already included in the first settlement
Answer: D
Rationale: A subsequent claim relating to an already settled event
requires careful examination to determine whether the newly identified damage
is genuinely attributable to the original insured occurrence and whether it was
omitted from the original assessment. The officer should review the first claim
file, inspection evidence, settlement documents and new evidence before
deciding whether further liability exists. Administrative details such as
telephone number or assessor employment do not establish whether the additional
damage is part of the original loss.
16. An insurer has received many claims from a particular
geographical area following severe flooding. Management wants to determine
whether the claims reflect a single catastrophe event or several unrelated
events. Which information would be most useful?
A. The
claimants' preferred payment methods
B. The exact timing, locations and causes of the reported losses
C. The age of the insurer's oldest policyholders
D. The number of claims officers assigned to other regions
Answer: B
Rationale: Establishing whether multiple claims arise from the same
event requires analysis of when and where the losses occurred and whether they
share a common cause. Dates, locations, flood characteristics and individual
loss circumstances can help determine whether claims should be associated with
one event for claims management and financial analysis. Payment preferences,
policyholder age and staffing levels elsewhere do not establish the
relationship between the reported losses.
17. A claims officer notices that the same vehicle
identification number appears on two separate claim files involving different
policyholders. What should the officer do?
A. Treat both
claims as valid because the vehicles are insured
B. Delete the older claim from the system
C. Investigate the duplicate identification and reconcile the relevant policy
and vehicle records
D. Pay the claim with the higher estimated loss first
Answer: C
Rationale: A duplicate vehicle identification number across
different claim files is a significant data-quality and potential
claims-integrity issue. The officer should verify the vehicle registration and
identification details, policy records, dates, ownership and circumstances of
both claims before proceeding. Automatically paying one claim or deleting a
record could conceal an error or potential fraud. Accurate computerized claims
records are essential for detecting such anomalies.
18. An insurer settles a claim for stolen equipment, but
some of the recovered equipment is subsequently found in police custody. What
should the claims officer consider?
A. Whether the
recovered property creates a salvage or recovery interest for the insurer after
settlement
B. Whether the claimant should automatically receive both the equipment and the
full settlement
C. Whether the original premium should be refunded in full
D. Whether the police should permanently retain the property for the claimant
Answer: A
Rationale: Once an insurer has indemnified the insured, recovery of
previously lost property may create rights or obligations concerning the
insurer's financial interest in that property, depending on the policy and
applicable legal procedures. The officer should therefore establish the
settlement terms, ownership position and appropriate recovery or salvage
process. Allowing the insured to retain both the full indemnity and recovered
property without considering the insurer's rights could result in double
recovery.
19. A claim is eventually found to be outside the policy
coverage. Which feature would make the insurer's repudiation decision most
defensible?
A. The
claimant's previous dissatisfaction with the insurer
B. A short message stating only that the claim is unsuccessful
C. A verbal instruction from another claims officer
D. A clear written explanation identifying the relevant policy basis and
supporting facts
Answer: D
Rationale: A defensible repudiation should be supported by a clear
explanation of the relevant policy provision, the material facts established
during investigation and how those facts lead to the coverage decision. This
creates transparency and an appropriate audit trail and allows the claimant to
understand the basis of the decision. A vague rejection or unsupported verbal
instruction does not provide the same level of accountability. The claimant's
previous dissatisfaction is irrelevant to whether the present claim is covered.
20. An insurer's claims department notices that claims are
frequently reopened because initial assessments fail to identify all relevant
damage. Which management response would be most useful?
A. Stop
reopening claims under all circumstances
B. Investigate the reasons for incomplete initial assessments and strengthen
assessment procedures
C. Increase every initial claim reserve by the same percentage
D. Require customers to submit duplicate claim forms
Answer: B
Rationale: Frequent reopening caused by incomplete initial
assessments indicates a possible weakness in the claims assessment process.
Management should identify the underlying causes, such as inadequate
inspections, insufficient technical information or poor documentation, and
improve the relevant procedures or training. Simply increasing reserves or
preventing reopening would not address the underlying problem. Duplicate claim
forms would add administrative burden without necessarily improving assessment
quality.
21. A claimant submits a claim for business interruption
following physical damage to insured premises. The property damage is accepted,
but the claimant provides only projected future profits to support the business
interruption amount. What should the claims officer primarily seek?
A. Evidence
supporting the actual financial impact and the applicable policy calculation
basis
B. The claimant's personal bank statements only
C. The original purchase price of the damaged building
D. A new premium quotation for the following year
Answer: A
Rationale: Business interruption claims require evidence that
supports the financial loss and allows the amount to be calculated according to
the policy's specified basis. Projected profits alone may not adequately
establish the actual loss because historical financial records, turnover, gross
profit, trends, saved expenses and the relevant indemnity period may be
necessary depending on the policy. The building's purchase price and future premium
quotation do not establish the business interruption loss.
22. A claims officer is reviewing a liability claim against
an insured business. The claimant alleges financial loss but provides no
evidence connecting the alleged loss to the insured's actions. What should the
officer primarily establish?
A. Whether the
claimant has previously insured the same business
B. Whether the claimant's requested amount is within the insured's policy limit
C. Whether there is sufficient evidence of liability and causation before
assessing quantum
D. Whether the insured has renewed the policy for the following year
Answer: C
Rationale: In a liability claim, establishing that a financial loss
occurred is not by itself sufficient. The insurer must consider whether the
insured is legally responsible and whether the alleged loss was caused by the
insured's acts or omissions, subject to the policy terms. Only after the
liability and causation issues are sufficiently established should the financial
amount, or quantum, be assessed. The policy limit and renewal status do not
establish liability.
23. A claims officer receives a claim where the insured has
already negotiated directly with a third party and signed an agreement
promising to pay a substantial amount. The policy requires the insurer's
consent before settlements are made. What should the officer primarily examine?
A. Whether the
third-party agreement affects the insurer's contractual position and liability
B. Whether the insured used a lawyer when signing the agreement
C. Whether the third party lives in the same district as the insured
D. Whether the insured paid the annual premium in cash
Answer: A
Rationale: An insured's independent settlement with a third party
may have contractual consequences where the policy requires the insurer's
consent before admission, negotiation or settlement of liability. The officer
should therefore review the exact policy condition, the agreement, the
circumstances under which it was made and whether it affects the insurer's
rights or obligations. The use of a lawyer, geographical location and payment
method do not determine the contractual effect of the settlement.
24. A claims department is comparing two months of claims
performance. In Month 1, 120 claims were reported and 90 were settled. In Month
2, 150 claims were reported and 135 were settled. Which conclusion is most
appropriate from these figures alone?
A. Month 2
necessarily had lower claim severity
B. Month 1 necessarily involved higher financial claims costs
C. Month 2 necessarily had better overall underwriting performance
D. Month 2 had a higher settlement-to-reported-claim ratio
Answer: D
Rationale: The settlement-to-reported-claim ratio in Month 1 is 90
÷ 120 = 75%, while in Month 2 it is 135 ÷ 150 = 90%. Therefore, Month 2 had the
higher settlement-to-reported-claim ratio based on the figures provided.
However, these figures alone do not establish claim severity, total financial
cost or underwriting profitability because the monetary values and exposure
information are not provided.
25. A claims manager asks an Insurance Officer II to review
a group of recently settled claims to determine whether payments complied with
delegated authority limits and approval procedures. What is the primary purpose
of this review?
A. To determine
whether customers should receive additional insurance discounts
B. To assess whether claims payments complied with internal controls and
authorization requirements
C. To replace the insurer's underwriting assessment process
D. To determine the market value of every insured asset
Answer: B
Rationale: Reviewing settled claims against delegated authority and
approval procedures is primarily a governance and internal-control exercise. It
helps determine whether payments were authorized by the appropriate personnel,
processed within prescribed limits and supported by the required documentation.
Such reviews can identify control weaknesses, unauthorized settlements and
procedural non-compliance. They do not replace underwriting or serve primarily
to determine asset values or customer discounts.
26. A
motor claim is submitted for TZS 18 million. The policy excess is TZS 1
million, but the assessor determines that TZS 3 million of the claimed damage
resulted from pre-existing defects rather than the reported accident. Assuming
the remaining damage is covered, what amount should ordinarily be considered before applying the policy excess or any
other adjustment?
D. TZS 17 million C. TZS 16 million B. TZS
15 million A. TZS 14 million
Answer:
B
Rationale: The first step is to establish the portion of the claimed loss that resulted from the insured accident. From the TZS 18 million claimed, TZS 3 million relates to pre-existing defects and is therefore excluded from the covered accident-related loss, leaving TZS 15 million. The TZS 1 million excess would then be considered separately. Because the question specifically asks for the amount before applying the excess or any other adjustment, the correct figure is TZS 15 million.
27. An insured reports that a vehicle was damaged after the
driver swerved to avoid an animal on the road. The driver lost control and
collided with a wall. Which concept is most relevant when determining whether
the collision resulted from a covered cause?
A. Contribution
between insurers
B. Insurable interest in the vehicle
C. Proximate cause of the loss
D. Recovery of salvage value
Answer: C
Rationale: Proximate cause is concerned with identifying the
dominant or effective cause of the loss where a sequence of events leads to the
damage. In this case, the officer must establish whether the swerving, loss of
control and collision form a continuous chain leading to the insured damage and
whether the effective cause falls within the policy's coverage. Contribution,
insurable interest and salvage address different aspects of insurance practice
and do not directly resolve the causation question.
28. A
commercial property policy is due for renewal. During review, the insurer
discovers that the insured substantially expanded the premises and installed
additional machinery during the previous policy period. What should the officer
recognize when reviewing the renewal documentation?
A. The previous terms should automatically
remain unchanged
B. The premium should automatically decrease because the policy is renewed
C. The expansion should be ignored because the existing policy remains active
D. The additional assets may require reassessment of the insured exposure
Answer:
D
Rationale: Expansion of premises and acquisition of additional machinery can materially increase the value and nature of the insured exposure. Renewal documentation should therefore reflect the current risk, including relevant sums insured, property details, business activities and applicable terms. The fact that the policy existed previously does not mean material changes can be ignored. Proper reassessment helps prevent inadequate insurance and ensures that the renewal terms and premium appropriately reflect the current exposure.
29. A claimant submits an invoice for vehicle repairs
showing a large increase in the price of a commonly available spare part. The
claims officer wants to establish whether the amount is reasonable. Which
source would provide the strongest direct evidence?
A. A quotation
from an authorized dealer for the equivalent part
B. The claimant's estimate of the expected replacement cost
C. The repairer's previous invoice for a different vehicle
D. The original purchase receipt of the damaged vehicle
Answer: A
Rationale: An authorized dealer's quotation for an equivalent spare
part provides a direct and comparatively reliable basis for assessing whether
the claimed price is reasonable. The claimant's estimate is not independent
evidence, a quotation concerning another vehicle may not reflect the correct
specification, and the vehicle's original purchase receipt does not establish
the current replacement cost of a particular component. This directly reflects
the duty of the claims officer to ascertain spare-part prices from authorized
dealers.
30. A policyholder has comprehensive motor insurance and
reports an accident three days after it occurred. The policy requires
notification "as soon as reasonably practicable." The insured
explains that immediate reporting was impossible because the driver was
hospitalized. What should the claims officer primarily assess?
A. Whether the
policyholder has made claims before
B. Whether the vehicle was purchased locally
C. Whether the accident occurred during daylight hours
D. Whether the delay was reasonably justified under the circumstances
Answer: D
Rationale: A notification condition requiring reporting as soon as
reasonably practicable should be considered in light of the circumstances
surrounding the delay. Hospitalization may provide a legitimate explanation for
why immediate notification was not possible. The officer should establish the
facts, consider the policy wording and determine whether the insured acted
within a reasonable period once circumstances permitted. The mere existence of
a delay does not necessarily justify rejection without considering whether the
delay amounted to a meaningful breach of the policy condition.
📘 Get the Full Aptitude Test Questions PDF through your Gmail (Questions 1–150)
You’ve just accessed the first 30 questions. The full set of 150 expertly prepared aptitude test questions for Insurance Officer II (Claims) -National Insurance Corporation (NIC), Is available, pay, and get access.
To get access to the full PDF, please make a payment of Tsh 10,000 to the LIPA numbers below:
After payment, please send a text message to notify us of your payment:
⚠️ Important Notice
- The PDF will be watermarked with your name and phone number and protected for personal use only.
- Redistribution, sharing, screenshotting, or copying the contents is strictly prohibited. When you share unlawfully, your name and phone number are visible and easy to trace as you leaked a document to other third parties.
- Legal action may be taken against the misuse of this material.
Thank you for supporting quality content. Best of luck in your interview preparation!
 -National Insurance Corporation (NIC).){kind=link}
0 Comments
PLACE YOUR COMMENT HERE
WARNING: DO NOT USE ABUSIVE LANGUAGE BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.
THE COMMENTS OF OUR READERS IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY.